We’re 20 years into the SaaS revolution now, and B2B companies have gotten the table stakes of an operational set-up for tactical go-to-market pretty much down. We know how to define our ideal customer profiles (ICP) in terms of firmographics. We understand the importance of technographics and the implications of existing installs on sellability. We’ve learned about buying team dynamics and we’ve gotten the hang of creating personas to help us address the typical needs of important functions and roles. And, if we have enough historical data, we can now pretty easily use analytics to model propensity to buy, project that onto a list of lookalike targets, and have at it. 

But what if you’re a new company and you don’t have the data you’d need to create an effective model? What if you’re small and you don’t have the resource to get all that groundwork done any time soon? What if you’re in a mature category and you’ve already completed all the set-up work – and all your competition has too? In those situations and more, innovative marketing and sales teams are starting to look at their challenges and opportunities through a different lens. Rather than viewing their ICP targets as lookalike companies who all deserve equal attention, they’re turning to sources of behavioral insight that can illuminate the actual people and real solution needs to focus on now. By shaping their own actions around the activity in the market, they’re better able to optimize resource allocations, deliver improved customer experiences and maximize their revenue.

Here’s the proof of why activity matters

When the global tele-qualification company Operatix leverages rich activity signals on behalf of their clients, they’ve achieved a 4X lift on typical conversion rates. And these meetings convert far better than average into real opportunities that progress into deals. When we executed our own extensive analysis of cold list-based demand gen tactics compared to those where we could see significant buyer activity, after over 6,000 outbound calls and more than a million emails, we showed that activity-based targeting yields an up to 7X lift in email response and a 5X improvement in MQLs qualified. What’s more, when rigorously applying the insights available to us to better prepare our callers, we’ve achieved as high as 19X improvement in meeting creation. Conversely, our cold lists required 4X more dials to get a meeting booked, and of those scheduled meetings, the show rate was 50% worse.

and similar variables. “A” accounts will then get more attention than those ranked “B” or “C.”  When buyer behavior is overlaid on such a ranking, something very interesting happens: Now the seller can make a much more informed choice of where exactly to focus their next outbound blitz for example, because they can see where there really is a deal taking shape, rather than having to continue with cold probes that commonly turn up little of immediate interest.

For field reps with only a few accounts, the value of activity is more subtle, but just as powerful. For a wide range of products, large accounts can typically have many buying centers. But if a salesperson has worked hard on a given account, maybe they’ve even sold a deal, the natural next step is to move on to another in their patch. When they have access to buyer activity data across the whole of the account, they’re able to immediately see demand present in other pockets even though they hadn’t had a chance to personally reach out to that buying center. Now they can make a truly informed choice of whether or not it’s time to move on or to strike while the iron is hot and leverage what they’ve learned into follow-on business.

How activity matters in demand gen

Because they’re often selling low-involvement products, many B2C marketers actually do have the ability to generate demand. As any first-year economics student will tell you – with all else being equal – if you lower the price of a commodity, “demand” for it can go up. B2B is different though. We may call what we do “demand gen” but it’s really about demand identification and demand capture. Unfortunately for all of us (and frankly, for our prospects) we’re all literally spending billions of dollars looking for demand where it could be at some point but actually isn’t right now. As a result, many of our processes and systems have been tailored to increase our volume of activity rather than its precision.  

Activity-based demand gen turns the table on this. It puts the focus squarely on improving conversion rates through quality interaction. When teams make the switch to activity-based targeting, we see them become much more picky about what they produce and what they invest in. Rather than staying satisfied with hypothetical personas, for example, they start learning all they can about the actual people who are exhibiting buying signals. They begin to work much more closely with their inside sellers to shape cadences more intelligently. They dig into their conversational marketing tools to better address and qualify inbound traffic. And importantly, we see them move beyond output-based KPIs, to focus on opportunity creation, pipeline movement, and revenue yield.

How activity matters in ABM

As we see it, the sole purpose behind investing in ABM programs is to increase the average revenue yield and total profit obtained from a specific set of target accounts. We plan to invest more on those accounts because, by doing so, we intend to get more out of them. We’re making an educated bet that there’s more demand in there than we’ve historically been able to tap into. And to go after it, we know we’ll have to do better at marketing and sales.

A notable difference we’re seeing between practitioners who are lukewarm on ABM and those who are shouting its benefits to the rafters stems in part from the efficiency of, and the scale to which they’ve been able to grow their successes.

The very best teams are starting to move beyond only doing better with a small set of laboratory accounts to measuring success objectives using a completely new type of metric. SiriusDecisions’s “demand unit” concept provides the intellectual groundwork for the evolving approach. Rather than just looking to beat a historically derived account quota, companies are now beginning to try to calculate the real potential of the account more accurately. Then, they’re planning and investing proportionally in marketing and sales based on that potential. Activity-based targeting is making it easier to operationalize advanced approaches like this. Practitioners are using it in ABM to build programs designed to maximize share of wallet yields per account.

Activity demands action

Buyer activity signals – combining what you’re able to capture on your own properties and obtain through third party sources – provide access to a more complete view of total demand activity in a given market category. Capturing this demand requires that you make a concerted effort to go after it. If in the presence of better information, you don’t change your processes, you shouldn’t expect better yields. Furthermore, the more granular and rich the signals’ components, the greater their accuracy will be in pinpointing opportunity and the greater potential that they will offer a guide to modifying your efforts in line with real behavior in the marketplace. The logic of this seems clear: When the task is to close business, it’s essential to listen and respond to what the customer is telling you. That’s how you can deliver better on customer experience. 

Marketers and sellers who are succeeding with activity-based targeting are pursuing activity aggressively. They’re throwing out rigid persona concepts to adapt to rapidly evolving buyer researcher types. They’re dynamically adjusting messaging and positioning to reflect how customers themselves view the issues. In sum, they’re becoming smarter, more agile and more customercentric than ever before.

Opinions expressed in this article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Marketing Land. Staff authors are listed here.

About The Author


5 Years – 300 Posts!July 30, 2019

Delight Comes LastJune 27, 2019

The Cost of LiesJune 18, 2019

Big Mood MachineJune 13, 2019

Simplicity is a warJune 07, 2019

Good reads this weekMay 24, 2019

Simple is expensiveMay 23, 2019

The next iPhoneMay 20, 2019

What’s a UX Strategy?April 23, 2019

The elegance of nothingApril 16, 2019

Working as a UX-leadApril 08, 2019

Working as a UX designerMarch 25, 2019

What is worth waiting for?February 25, 2019

Leadership or managementFebruary 22, 2019

Everyone should own a dogFebruary 18, 2019

Silence is goldFebruary 15, 2019

Cameras that understandFebruary 07, 2019

Humans, not usersJanuary 29, 2019

Keeping AI HonestJanuary 23, 2019

Right to privacyJanuary 18, 2019

2018 in reviewDecember 28, 2018

What’s my location?December 17, 2018

The State of UX in 2019December 13, 2018

Why scrap scrappy?November 29, 2018

I’m taking a breakOctober 22, 2018

Organized for browsingOctober 12, 2018

Stay humble, stay eagerOctober 08, 2018

Tesla, software and disruptionSeptember 18, 2018

The iPhone FranchiseSeptember 13, 2018

The Long Goodbye (To Facebook)September 12, 2018

Living among baby robotsAugust 30, 2018

Why Small Teams WinAugust 17, 2018

Back to Work!August 13, 2018

The Bullshit WebAugust 12, 2018

Just keep at itJuly 20, 2018

The Race to a TrillionJuly 16, 2018

Cheap Shower CurtainsJuly 16, 2018

Let them eat cakeMay 24, 2018

Netflix CultureMay 21, 2018

SkypeMay 16, 2018

How do you learn UX?May 14, 2018

UnfounderedMay 07, 2018

Vanity MetricsApril 26, 2018

Tech is not NeutralApril 24, 2018

ProductivityApril 16, 2018

Whose risk?April 09, 2018

Why Small Teams WinApril 09, 2018

Phone BoredApril 09, 2018

Karim RashidApril 09, 2018

Creative Class is openApril 09, 2018

Dieter RamsApril 03, 2018

Bleeding OutMarch 29, 2018

Fake News is spamMarch 29, 2018

Conversational DesignMarch 27, 2018

DropboxMarch 27, 2018

Bye bye FacebookMarch 19, 2018

CubaMarch 19, 2018

The seat at the tableMarch 19, 2018

GivenchyMarch 15, 2018

Love letters to treesMarch 11, 2018

Pricing PhilisophyFebruary 28, 2018

SpecializeFebruary 28, 2018

PersonasFebruary 11, 2018

Make me thinkFebruary 01, 2018

The Future of RetailJanuary 22, 2018

Hawaii Missile AlertJanuary 15, 2018

2017 reviewJanuary 08, 2018

Why Design Systems failJanuary 05, 2018

What You BuildJanuary 05, 2018

Enjoyable UX vs. Usable UXNovember 14, 2017

Checkout for WinnersNovember 10, 2017

Living a Testing CultureNovember 10, 2017

What do you do?October 31, 2017

Creative ClassOctober 07, 2017

How To Predict Your FutureSeptember 25, 2017

Stop Saying E-mail is BrokenSeptember 25, 2017

Carpe Diem UX-designersSeptember 11, 2017

What´s Good Design?September 04, 2017

Chasing GrowthAugust 29, 2017

GithubAugust 28, 2017

MediumAugust 25, 2017

A RedesignAugust 15, 2017

Design quotesJuly 10, 2017

EnoughJuly 07, 2017

Why?July 04, 2017

ARKitJune 30, 2017

The Why before the WhyJune 30, 2017

Designing for MobileMarch 28, 2017

Is Less More?March 06, 2017

Designing for AccessibilityFebruary 21, 2017

Why Simple is HardFebruary 07, 2017

Becoming a Better DesignerJanuary 19, 2017

Pricing It PerfectlyNovember 22, 2016

Failure, Reflect, RenewSeptember 28, 2016

Trusting Your GutJune 27, 2016

Built to lastMarch 07, 2016

Why User Experiences MatterJanuary 12, 2016

An Eye on the FutureDecember 16, 2015

The Fundamentals of Good UXDecember 07, 2015

GrowthJune 16, 2015

Working with meMay 05, 2015

Understanding UI DesignApril 14, 2015

UX Design explainedApril 14, 2015

Look and Feel and FeelApril 13, 2015

Great user experienceApril 09, 2015

Naming your iconsApril 07, 2015

ConversationsNovember 13, 2014